Independent software guidance for creators and small teams.

How we reviewAffiliate disclosure
ToolMerit
SearchStart here →

CORRECTIONS & UPDATES

When the facts
change, the page
should too.

Software, prices, policies, ownership, and product capabilities change. If ToolMerit gets a material fact wrong, misses a relevant disclosure, or leaves time-sensitive guidance stale, we want to know — and to make the record clearer.

01

Accuracy matters more than saving face. A credible correction improves the page; it is not a failure to hide.

02

Evidence and reader impact set the priority. A broken price or missing disclosure may matter more than a stylistic preference.

03

The record should remain understandable. Material changes are noted when that context helps a reader interpret what changed.

REPORT A CORRECTION

Give us the
clearest starting point.

Use the editorial contact form for a factual error, outdated product information, missing commercial context, unclear attribution, or a material change that may affect a reader’s decision.

Do not submit passwords, account access, private customer data, security vulnerabilities, or confidential documents. For security issues, use the provider’s official security channel rather than this form.

INCLUDE WHEN YOU CANThree useful details
  1. 01
    The ToolMerit page URL

    Tell us exactly where the information appears, including the relevant section when possible.

  2. 02
    The specific issue

    State what is inaccurate, missing, expired, misleading, or unclear — rather than only saying the page is “wrong.”

  3. 03
    A source we can check

    Link to official documentation, a pricing page, a public policy, or another reliable source. Explain its date or limitation if relevant.

Open correction form →

HOW A REPORT IS HANDLED

Evidence leads the
next step.

We do not guarantee a personal response, a requested editorial outcome, or a particular timetable. We do commit to assessing substantive reports according to the claim, source quality, and likely reader impact.

01

Receive

We identify the page, claim, report type, and evidence supplied. Reports without a source can still be useful leads, but may take longer to assess.

02

Check

An editor compares the report with the page, relevant primary sources, the date of the claim, and any necessary internal editorial context.

03

Decide

We correct, update, annotate, decline, or continue investigating based on the evidence and what a reasonable reader needs to understand.

04

Record

When a change materially affects the page’s facts, fit, disclosure, or conclusion, we add a correction or update note where it helps preserve context.

WHAT MAY CHANGE

Not every edit is
the same kind of update.

TYPE OF CHANGEEXAMPLEWHAT THE PAGE SHOULD SHOW
Minor maintenance

A link is repaired, wording is clarified, or a non-material presentation issue is resolved.

The modified date may change; a correction note is not normally needed.
Material factual update

Pricing, availability, ownership, plan limits, policy terms, or a material capability has changed.

Relevant content is revised, with an updated date and context where useful.
Editorial conclusion update

New evidence or a product change affects who a recommendation fits, a comparison outcome, or a stated tradeoff.

The conclusion and supporting explanation are revised; a clear change note may be added.
Correction

A material factual error, missing disclosure, inaccurate attribution, or misleading statement needs to be fixed.

The incorrect information is corrected and a correction note is added when reader context warrants it.

PUBLIC CORRECTION RECORD

Material changes,
kept inspectable.

When a material correction needs public context, editors add a date, type, and brief note to the affected WordPress page. This ledger displays those published records; minor formatting and routine link maintenance do not normally appear here.

No public correction records have been published yet.

Editors add a record by setting tb_correction_date (YYYY-MM-DD), tb_correction_type, and tb_correction_note on the affected published WordPress content. This page will then list it automatically.

Report a correction →

WHAT A REPORT CAN — AND CANNOT — DO

We correct the
record, not the verdict
on request.

We will consider verifiable facts.

Pricing, product availability, documentation, direct attributions, disclosed relationships, and time-sensitive claims can all merit review.

We will reconsider a conclusion when evidence changes it.

A product team, reader, or contributor can provide relevant evidence. The evidence, not the sender’s status, guides the editorial decision.

×

We do not sell or guarantee changes.

Payment, advertising, affiliate participation, free access, pressure, or a demand for a favorable result do not determine whether content changes.

×

We do not use the form for account support.

Billing, account access, product defects, and security concerns belong with the software provider’s official support or security team.